Editor MNH: 1/8/05

No, Rev. M-W , it is not the fear of the other which makes us, the heterosexual majority oppose legalizing same sex unions. Sex between a same gender couple is like the couple sitting in a car which has no connection between the motor and the wheels. We neither fear nor hate this couple, but think it silly to give them a driver’s license when their car just sits in the driveway, going nowhere and pulling nothing. And why should we dole out gasoline to such a couple? Just that the two can have fun revving up the engine?. The purpose of marriage is children. Husband, wife and children make a family, the mainstay and future of society. That is why in the past society has given legal protection and benefits to the family. Sure, two lesbians can resort to artificial insemination. But that is still an anomaly. Should it ever become the norm we will have arrived at Huxley’s Brave New World.

These men of the cloth, sheep’s clothing, who promote gay unions, subscribe to the Judeo/communistic agenda of “free” love, a euphemism for free sex, the sexual instinct freed from its purpose. Under Communism in the former Soviet Union and the Spanish (Soviet) Republic any sex was as good as the other. For the unwanted consequence of “free” heterosexual “love” the remedy was abortion on demand. The men had the freedom and the women had the abortion. The Communist promotion of free “love” acted as a tremendous lure for the homosexual/bisexual British educated elite who betrayed England by spying for the Soviet Union. To have their homosexuality/bisexuality accepted meant more to these men than their country. What is meant by decadence? It is the unshackling of the instinct from its purpose. The ancient ruins of Rome send their greetings.